Skip to content
Forticer
Solutions & industry use cases

Problem to production, by industry.

Five blueprints from representative engagements, anonymized: the problem as it arrived, the system that shipped, and the numbers that moved. Every one runs in production today.

FinTech

Automated risk assessment & fraud detection

Payments platform40M+ transactions / monthUS & EU

The problem

Fraud losses were growing faster than transaction volume. Risk models refreshed quarterly, so new typologies ran unchecked for months; manual review queues stretched to six hours per case while regulators pressed for explainable decisions. Every mitigation traded loss for friction, false positives were quietly taxing good customers.

What shipped

  • Real-time scoring service, sub-50ms at p99
  • Graph-based fraud feature store across accounts, devices and merchants
  • Eval harness with golden fraud sets gating every model release
  • Analyst case console, the model abstains, humans decide

Problem-to-production blueprint

1DiagnosisLoss decomposition across fraud typologies; the queue, not the model, was the first bottleneck.
2Architecture & PoCReal-time scoring plus graph feature store, proven against 90 days of labelled history.
3Production engineeringStreaming features, model gateway, eval harness, case console, hardened and load-tested.
4StewardshipWeekly drift reviews matured into fully automated daily refresh with rollback gates.

Outcomes

-42%False positives
11 minCase review, was 6 hrs
DailyModel refresh, was quarterly
Rail and manufacturing

Months of compliance reading, done in minutes

Rail systems manufacturerSafety-critical certificationGermany

The problem

A German manufacturer of safety-critical rail systems ran certification the way it had been run for decades. Senior engineers cross-referencing product specifications against regulation and against every previous certification, by hand. Each pass took weeks to months.

What shipped

  • An agentic pipeline that reads the specification, the applicable regulation and the certification history together
  • A supervisor and worker architecture that keeps each agent scoped to one job
  • Every conclusion tied back to its source documents, an answer with its evidence attached
  • An engineer review and approval step on every output

Problem-to-production blueprint

1DiagnosisMapped the manual certification pass: which documents were cross-referenced against which, where the weeks went, and what a defensible conclusion has to show.
2Architecture & PoCA supervisor and worker agent design, each agent scoped to one job, proven on real specifications, regulation and certification history.
3Production engineeringEvery conclusion traced back to its source documents, so the output is an answer with its evidence attached, ready for audit.
4StewardshipEngineers review and approve each output; senior time returns from document work to engineering.

Outcomes

MinutesCompliance cross-reference
Full traceEvidence path per conclusion
Senior hoursEngineering time returned
Healthcare

Secure, HIPAA-compliant patient analytics & AI pipelines

Provider network12 sitesUnited States

The problem

Leadership needed a population-health view across twelve sites, but PHI could not leave the compliance boundary. Every analysis waited weeks for de-identified extracts; a previous vendor's proposal died in security review. The network was data-rich and decision-poor, readmissions were being managed on intuition.

What shipped

  • Governed lakehouse deployed inside the client's own cloud tenancy
  • De-identification at ingestion; PHI never crosses the boundary
  • Readmission-risk models with clinician-readable audit trails
  • Row-level, role-based access mapped to clinical duty

Problem-to-production blueprint

1DiagnosisData-boundary and compliance mapping, worked jointly with privacy counsel before any architecture.
2Architecture & PoCTenancy-resident lakehouse design; de-identification proven on one site's historical data.
3Production engineeringTwelve-site rollout with access controls, audit trails and readmission models in the loop.
4Integration & stewardshipClinician dashboards, model monitoring, and a quarterly compliance review cadence the client now runs.

Outcomes

Same dayTime to insight, was 3 wks
0.84Readmission AUC, from 0.68
ZeroPHI incidents in 24 mo
Supply Chain & Logistics

Real-time route optimization & inventory forecasting

Regional 3PL400+ vehicles6 distribution centers

The problem

Routes were planned overnight against demand data that was already stale by dispatch. Trucks left full and returned half-empty; stockouts triggered expedited freight that quietly consumed the quarter's margin. Planners overrode the system so often that nobody trusted its numbers, or knew when it was actually right.

What shipped

  • Live demand model fed by streaming vehicle and order telemetry
  • Route re-optimization triggered by disruption events, not the clock
  • SKU-level demand forecasts wired directly into replenishment
  • Planner console with auditable overrides, trust, measured

Problem-to-production blueprint

1DiagnosisMargin-leak decomposition: routing waste vs stockouts vs expedited freight, quantified per lane.
2Architecture & PoCStreaming telemetry plus live demand model, proven on the two worst-performing lanes.
3Production engineeringEvent-triggered re-optimization and forecast-to-replenishment automation across all six DCs.
4StewardshipWeekly forecast-accuracy reviews with planners; override analytics feed the next model iteration.

Outcomes

-18%Cost per route
93%Forecast accuracy, from 71%
-37%Stockout events, YoY
Enterprise Operations

Internal AI document intelligence & workflow agents

Insurance operations60,000 documents / month4 systems of record

The problem

Sixty thousand documents a month, claims, endorsements, broker correspondence, were keyed by hand into four systems of record. Fourteen-day backlogs were normal; quality audits caught errors weeks after they had propagated downstream. Headcount could not scale with intake, and the best analysts spent their days retyping PDFs.

What shipped

  • LLM extraction pipeline with confidence-gated outputs
  • Workflow agents filing into all four systems of record
  • Exception review console for the cases that need a human
  • Continuous evaluation against human corrections

Problem-to-production blueprint

1DiagnosisDocument taxonomy and exception analysis, which 20% of document types caused 80% of rework.
2Architecture & PoCConfidence-gated extraction proven on 10,000 historical documents against known-good values.
3Production engineeringFiling agents with per-system rollback, exception console, and full processing audit log.
4StewardshipHuman corrections feed continuous evals; scope expanded to two more document classes per quarter.

Outcomes

4 hrsProcessing, was 14 days
78%Straight-through, from 12%
1,200Analyst hrs/mo reclaimed
Not listed?

Your industry isn't listed? The method transfers.

Nine industries shipped so far. The constant isn't the domain, it's diagnosis before prescription, and one owner from first decision to production.

Book a discovery call